“The big question: Is this still information architecture? (…) I can’t answer that question for everyone, of course, but yes, it’s definitely IA from my perspective and in my (scientific) narrative.”
(Andreas Resmini a.k.a. @resmini)
/* @since Twenty Ten 1.0 * Adjusted by PJB * DELTA 17.Jan.02016: * Add meta elements * Delete RDF * Cleanup of header * Major rework on header * New search box * Grid fine-tuning * Add page styling.css * Change main nav * Change pod of linked files * Adding Modernizr 2.0.6; * Implementing AnimaSearch * FrontalLobe 2016 */ ?>
Search through all 7402 posts
“The big question: Is this still information architecture? (…) I can’t answer that question for everyone, of course, but yes, it’s definitely IA from my perspective and in my (scientific) narrative.”
(Andreas Resmini a.k.a. @resmini)
“Can a craft-like profession of information architecture that lacks internal theory keep up with the growing complexities of ubiquitous ecosystems that comprise both digital and physical objects? I don’t think so. To position the practice of information architecture for future success, we must not wait for the future to arrive, but try to anticipate it – and, in some cases, even help to create it. To offer theories of information architecture that transcend Web sites, applications, and screens, we need to pursue original theories of information architecture that address Web sites, applications, and screens, period. If we fail to do this, Toon and the rest of the IA community will have to be satisfied with stolen insights from other fields.”
(Nathaniel Davis a.k.a. @iatheory ~ UXmatters)